ShellVersusSolid

Introduction

As a reminder a simple comparison between SOLID186 and SHELL181 is reported

Mesh

Solid.PNG SOLID186 Mesh
ShellMesh.PNG SHELL181 Mesh, Surface is loacted at middle-surface of the solid model

Stresses

The stress result is reported in term of radial stress that can be directly linked to the radial bending moment
SxSolid.PNG Radial stress with Solid
SX-Shell.PNG Radial stress at Top of SHELL181

Comparison

Using Roarke formulas the bending moment at the cilinder surface and at the center of the closing disk can be calculate as a function of the assumed disk radius

Radius [m] Bending at Cilinder [Nm] Stress [MPa] Bending at Center [Nm] Stress [MPa] Simply Supported Bending Moment at Center [Nm] Simply Supported Stress [MPa]
Mean cilinder Radius (0.308) 263603 632 171342 411 434945 1043
Inner Cilinder Border (0.285) 226496 544 147222 353 373719 897
Start of Fillet (0.22) 134492 323 87419 209 221910 532

Stress Linearization

Using stress linearizartion it is possible to determine the equivalent bending moment in the SOLID186 section at center and at fillet start. The radial stress behaviour is clearly linear allowing the calculation of the equivalent bending stress.

LinearizedSX.PNG Linearized stress at Center section of the SOLID186 Model
LinearizedSXOuter.PNG Linearized stress at Cilinder surface section where fillet starts of the SOLID186 Model

The equivalent bending radial stress at the center of the disk

              ** BENDING **  I=INSIDE C=CENTER O=OUTSIDE

      SX          SY          SZ         SXY         SYZ         SXZ

 I -0.2761E+09 -0.2761E+09 -0.1364E+08 -0.6106E-04  0.5699E-04   6018.    
 O  0.2761E+09  0.2761E+09  0.1364E+08  0.6106E-04 -0.5699E-04  -6018.    

and at the fillet start

              ** BENDING **  I=INSIDE C=CENTER O=OUTSIDE

      SX          SY          SZ         SXY         SYZ         SXZ

 I  0.2195E+09  0.2069E+08  0.1256E+08 -0.9022E+05  0.3692E+05 -0.1102E+08
 O -0.2195E+09 -0.2069E+08 -0.1256E+08  0.9022E+05 -0.3692E+05  0.1102E+08

Summary

For the present geometry the following considerations can be drawn

  1. the stress of the shell model, at the mean cilinder surface (restrained edge fo the Roarke formulae), is very close to the analytical but much higher than the >SOLID186 model
  2. stress of the SHELL model, extracted at the inner cilinder surface, is much closer to the bending equivalent of the SOLID186 but still of a order two respect to the latter
  3. bending stress, at the center of the disk, is inside the range of values for disk radius between the inner surface radius and the fillet start radius for fully restrained edge and

Bottom

-- RobertoBernetti - 23 May 2013
Topic attachments
I Attachment Action Size DateSorted ascending Who Comment
Solid.PNGPNG Solid.PNG manage 81 K 23 May 2013 - 12:53 RobertoBernetti Solid Mesh
ShellMesh.PNGPNG ShellMesh.PNG manage 74 K 23 May 2013 - 12:54 RobertoBernetti Shell Mesh
SxSolid.PNGPNG SxSolid.PNG manage 37 K 23 May 2013 - 12:55 RobertoBernetti Sigma Radiale SOLID
SX-Shell.PNGPNG SX-Shell.PNG manage 25 K 23 May 2013 - 12:56 RobertoBernetti Sigma Radiale TOP Shell
LinearizedSX.PNGPNG LinearizedSX.PNG manage 29 K 23 May 2013 - 12:58 RobertoBernetti Linearized STress at Cilinder Center
LinearizedSXOuter.PNGPNG LinearizedSXOuter.PNG manage 30 K 23 May 2013 - 12:59 RobertoBernetti Linearized Stress at Cilinder fillet section
Topic revision: r1 - 24 Feb 2017, UnknownUser
This site is powered by FoswikiCreative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License1999-2025
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this site? Send feedback